What Is Non-Vesting Condition

Example: Stock-based compensation with variable bonuses based on market conditions On January 1, 20X1, Entity A promises to grant 100 shares to each of its 200 employees if the share price exceeds $10 as of December 31, 20X2 or 150 shares if the share price exceeds $15 at that time. To receive shares, employees must still be employed by Unit A as of December 31, 20X2. The fair value of a stock whose market acquires a target price of $10 is $7 and falls to $4 with a price target of $15. Non-acquisition conditions are treated in the same way as market acquisition conditions, i.e. they are included in the fair value of the equity instruments granted and the goods or services are recognised immediately or during the acquisition period (if acquisition conditions exist), regardless of whether the non-exercise condition is ultimately met (IFRS 2.21A). Interestingly, IFRS 2 does not contain a definition of a non-exercise condition. However, it is found in IFRS 2.BC364: The non-exercise condition is any condition that does not determine whether the entity is receiving the services that entitle the counterparty to receive cash, other assets or equity instruments from the entity under an equity-based compensation agreement. Examples of non-exercise conditions include: target based on a commodity index, specified payments for a savings plan during the exercise period, continuation of the plan by the company, non-compete obligation, transfer restrictions. Acquisition: “Become a claim.

Under a share-based remuneration agreement, the right of a counterparty to receive cash, other assets or equity instruments from the entity becomes vested when the counterparty`s claim is no longer subject to the satisfaction of the acquisition terms. The requirements for the treatment of acquisition terms in share-based compensation transactions are summarized in a decision tree, further discussions will follow. For cash-settled stock compensation transactions, see a separate section below. In addition, only 2% of employees left for 20X1, so Company A revised its initial estimate and now 190 employees (95% of the first 200) should meet the terms of service. At the time of the grant, it is estimated that 90% of the 200 employees will meet the condition of service. Summary: Share-based payment transactions with cash settlement are dealt with in IFRS 2.30-33D. The general recognition criteria are very similar to share-based compensation transactions with share settlement, but the credit is recognised as a liability rather than on equity. This liability is measured at the fair value of the instruments granted and revalued at each balance sheet date. The expense and the corresponding liability are recognised over time during the acquisition period. The treatment of acquisition terms is similar to payment transactions for share settlement shares, with the notable exception of market acquisition conditions, which should be taken into account when reassessing the fair value of liabilities. Therefore, the cumulative amount ultimately seized for goods or services received for stock compensation paid in cash is equal to the money that is ultimately paid to the employee (or any other party providing goods or services). This is not always the case for share-based compensation transactions with share compensation.

B for example in the event of non-compliance with the conditions of acquisition on the market or cancellation. If acquisition terms are attached, but they are only terms and conditions of employment, the stock compensation business will be recognized over time during the fiscal year period. The Terms of Use do not affect the fair value of the instruments granted. Instead, they are taken into account by adjusting the number of equity instruments included in the valuation of the transaction, and this estimate is revised at each balance sheet date (an entity must make the best available estimate of the number of likely acquired equity instruments). After the exercise period, ADLs relate only to instruments that are actually acquired (IFRS 2.19-20). Condition of Service: “A condition of acquisition that requires the other party to complete a certain period of service during which the services are provided to the Company. If, for whatever reason, the other party interrupts the service during the blocking period, it has not fulfilled the condition. A condition of service does not require that a performance target be met.

The price target is not reached during the 20X3, but this fact does not affect the approach, as the estimate of the duration of the expected acquisition period based on the market performance condition cannot be revised retrospectively (IFRS 2.15b). In addition, the actual number of employees who met the conditions of service during the estimated capital period was 184 (92%). Acquisition condition: “A condition that determines whether the entity receives the services that give the counterparty the right to receive cash, other assets or equity instruments from the entity under a share-based compensation agreement. An acquisition condition is either a service condition or a performance condition. BC363 The Board noted that there is no formal definition of the non-exercise condition in IFRS 2, but that the implementation guidance on the breakdown between acquisition and non-exercise conditions is set out in an organizational chart in paragraph IG24 of IFRS 2. Company A enters the last year of the planned acquisition period (even if the share price target has not been met) and adjusts only for the number of employees who met the terms of service during the estimated lock-up period. Therefore, the accounting entry for year 20X3 is as follows: Example: Share-based compensation with condition of acquisition of services and market status First, unit A enters the expenditure for year 3, taking into account the actual number of employees who fulfilled the condition of service and the final market price of the shares (the latter only concerns the responsibility component). This is recorded for the year 20X3 as follows: There have been no further changes. 88% of the employees stayed in the company and fulfilled the conditions of service. Entries for the year 20X3 under approach #1 are as follows: For more information on performance targets that meet market conditions, see the next section. Performance Condition: “An exercise condition that requires the following: As of December 31, 20X1, the price of the Company`s shares on the stock exchange decreases and the fair value of the stock options is now $20. However, the reduction in the fair value of stock options does not affect the recognition of stock-based compensation transactions, as it is a condition of acquisition in the market.

It had already been taken into account when estimating the fair value of stock options at the time of grant, which will not be revalued thereafter after the award date. The IFRS Interpretation Committee continued discussions on the distinction between acquisition and non-acquisition conditions in order to determine the next steps in the process. At the time of the award, the fair value of the shares awarded is estimated at $30 each. This fair value does not take into account the operating conditions at 3 years, but the condition of acquisition of the market of point 2. This is the last year of service. 186 employees (93% of the original 200) remained in the company after these 3 years. It turned out that as of December 31, 20X3, the share price was only 15% higher compared to the grant date and employees were not receiving any shares. However, the charges recorded in 20X1-20X2 will not be reversed as the condition relating to a price increase of 20% was taken into account when estimating the fair value of the shares at the time of the grant (as this was a market condition). The fair value of the instruments granted will not be revalued subsequently after the date of grant and the recognition of stock options will not be cancelled. BC362 ED respondents felt that the clarity of IFRS 2 could be further enhanced by defining a “non-exercise condition”. The 1.

On January 20, 1, entity A`s board of directors announced to its employees a share allocation plan that sets out all the terms and conditions. The fiscal period for this plan is 3 years. The announcement also made it clear that this share allocation plan had to be approved by the Supervisory Board. The Supervisory Board approved the plan on 20 February 20X1. BC364 The Commission noted that the creation of a stand-alone definition of the condition of non-exercise would not be the best solution to clarify this issue. This is due to the Commission`s conclusion that the notion of non-exercise condition can be derived from paragraphs BC170-BC184 of IFRS 2, which clarify the definition of acquisition conditions. In accordance with these guidelines, it can be concluded that a non-exercise condition is any condition that does not determine whether the entity receives the services that entitle the counterparty to receive cash, other assets or equity instruments from the entity as part of a share-based remuneration IFRIC received a request in May 2009 to clarify the definition of exercise and non-exercise conditions in IFRS 2 Share-based remuneration. In particular, IFRIC was asked the following questions: At its January 2010 meeting, IFRIC had provisionally agreed to include a project on its agenda to clarify the distinction between a condition of service, a condition of performance and a condition of non-performance. At this meeting, staff provided preliminary analysis and views from staff. The 1. January 20X1 grants Company A 100 stock options to each of its 200 employees, provided they are still working for Company A on December 31, 20X3.

The fair value of the stock options is estimated at $30 (excluding the condition of service, as this is a non-market condition). .